Daging organik: kualitas, persepsi konsumen, dan aplikasi di Indonesia

Authors

  • Nisa Afifah Nur Fadilah Universitas Jember
  • Muhammad Farid Alfarisi Universitas Jember
  • Rindi Wirantika Septio Universitas Jember
  • Desy Cahya Widianingrum Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2022.352

Keywords:

healthy meat, health care, organic market, opportunity

Abstract

Organic food products are currently or have even become a trend for public consumption. This paper was compiled to summarize the differences in the characteristics of organic and non-organic meat for some livestock commodities, how consumers perceive and accept organic meat products, as well as examples of applications and how to get organic certification in Indonesia. Based on the literature study that has been carried out, it is known that the character of organic meat has a meat taste that is savorier with a more chewy meat texture. Organic livestock has better quality than non-organic, especially its nutritional content which is healthy because of the essential fat content produced in meat. Consumer food choices have a huge impact on the environment. The environmental impact of organic meat is high because consumers have beliefs about environmental friendliness although it is not significant. Consumers perceive organic meat as meat that is healthy, safe, natural, delicious, expensive, environmentally friendly, and of good quality. The reason people do not consume organic meat is the low supply and high price, as well as the lack of assurance that the meat is truly organic. Several farms that have applied organic systems in Indonesia are CV Rahayu in Sigi, Central Sulawesi, TML Farm in Bogor, West Java, Bina Sarana Bakti Foundation in Bogor, West Java, PT. Wahyu Utama Group in Tuban, East Java, etc. The guarantee of organic products has been facilitated by the presence of a certification body. Several certification bodies that handle organic farming include PT Sucofindo, PT Mutuagung Lestari, INOFICE, LeSOS, BIOCert Indonesia, PT Icert Agritama Internasional, etc. Thus, producers gain market trust and consumers get product quality assurance. In the future, the organic industry has the challenges of product development and the possibility of wider market interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, Z., Pratiwi, N. A., & Brata, B. D. (2021). Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Makanan Organik dan Pembentukan Strategi Business Canvas Pada Start Up Organic Market di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 9 (4), 1461-1476.

Barton, G. A. (2018). The Global History of Organic Farming. Oxford University Press..

Biocert. 2021. Daftar Klien Biocert. Diakses pada http://www.biocert.co.id/uploads/biocert/client_list_doc/2101_F.7.3.1%20BIOCert%20Client%20List_E1.2_20220629.pdf 5 juli 2022.

Çapan, B., & Bağdatli, A. (2021). Investigation of physicochemical, microbiological and sensorial properties for organic and conventional retail chicken meat. Food Science and Human Wellness, 10 (2), 183-190.

Edwards, L. E., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2021). The impact of management, husbandry and stockperson decisions on the welfare of laying hens in Australia. Animal Production Science.

El-Deek, A., & El-Sabrout, K. (2019). Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. World's Poultry Science Journal, 75 (1), 105-114.

Icert. (2022). Organik Indonesia: Peternakan Dan Produk Asal Ternak. Diakses pada https://icert.id/sertifikasi-organik/organik-indonesia/peternakan-organik/. 4 Juli 2022.

Janarko, B. A., Prijadi, B. P., Firman, F., Arifin, F., & Suherman, L. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Intensi Konsumen Membeli Daging Organik di Jabodetabek. Indonesian Business Review, 3 (1), 36-55.

Kementerian Perdagangan, 2022. Usung Hidup Lebih Sehat, Produk Organik IndonesiaCetakTransaksi PotensialUSD 5,9 Juta di Amerika Serikat. https://www.kemendag.go.id/id/newsroom/trade-news/usung-hidup-lebih-sehat-produk-organik-indonesia-cetak-transaksi-potensial-usd-5-9-juta-di-amerika-serikat-1 diakses pada 5 Juli 2022

Komite Akreditasi Nasional (2017). Direktori Klien LS Organik. Diakses pada http://kan.or.id/index.php/documents/terakreditasi/doc17021/sni-iso-iec-17065/lembaga-sertifikasi-organik. 4 Juli 2022.

Lazaro, E. A., Halberg, N., Andreasen, L., Karantininis, K., Rye Kledal, P., Mugisha, J., ... & Mbapila, S. (2014). Urbanization and transformation of agri-food system: Opportunities for organic producers in developing countries.

Lazzarini, G. A., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2017). Our own country is best: Factors influencing consumers’ sustainability perceptions of plant-based foods. Food quality and preference, 60, 165-177.

Leenstra, F., Maurer, V., Bestman, M., van Sambeek, F., Zeltner, E., Reuvekamp, B., ... & van Niekerk, T. (2012). Performance of commercial laying hen genotypes on free range and organic farms in Switzerland, France and The Netherlands. British Poultry Science, 53(3), 282-290.

Lesos. 2022. Prosedur LeSOS. Diakses pada http://lesosindonesia.com/prosedur/1 5 Juli 2022

de Oliveira Padilha, L. G., Malek, L., & Umberger, W. J. (2022). Consumers’ attitudes towards lab-grown meat, conventionally raised meat and plant-based protein alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 99, 104573.

Owusu, V., & Owusu Anifori, M. (2013). Consumer willingness to pay a premium for organic fruit and vegetable in Ghana. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 16(1030-2016-82931), 67-86.

Rabadán, A., Díaz, M., Brugarolas, M., & Bernabéu, R. (2020). Why don't consumers buy organic lamb meat? A Spanish case study. Meat science, 162, 108024.

Ruswanti, E., Gantino, R., & Sihombing, S. O. (2019). Predicting the influence of integrated marketing communication on intention to buy organic product: an empirical study. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 32-37.

Salam, M., Nasrun, M. S., & Rasyid, S. A. (2021). Strategi Pemasaran Ayam Kampung Organik pada CV. Rahayu di Desa Mpanau Kecamatan Sigi Biromaru Kabupaten Sigi. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 4(1), 18-26.

Schleenbecker, R., & Hamm, U. (2013). Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. Appetite, 71, 420-429.

Septianto, F., Kemper, J., & Paramita, W. (2019). The role of imagery in promoting organic food. Journal of business research, 101, 104-115.

Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Mayerhofer, T. (2017). What is this thing called organic?–How organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy, 68, 10-20.

Sharma, B., Vaish, B., Singh, U. K., Singh, P., & Singh, R. P. (2019). Recycling of organic wastes in agriculture: an environmental perspective. International journal of environmental research, 13(2), 409-429.

Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2019). Impact of sustainability perception on consumption of organic meat and meat substitutes. Appetite, 132, 196-202.

Vukasovič, T. (2013). Attitude towards organic meat: an empirical investigation on West Balkans Countries (WBC) consumers. World's Poultry Science Journal, 69(3), 527-540.

Waskito, D., Ananto, M., & Reza, A. (2014). Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Makanan Organik di Yogyakarta. Pelita-Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa UNY, 9(01).

Wong, S. S., & Aini, M. S. (2017). Factors influencing purchase intention of organic meat among consumers in Klang Valley, Malaysia. International Food Research Journal, 24(2).

Downloads

Published

2022-11-08

How to Cite

Fadilah, N. A. N., Alfarisi, M. F. ., Septio, R. W., & Widianingrum, D. C. (2022). Daging organik: kualitas, persepsi konsumen, dan aplikasi di Indonesia. Conference of Applied Animal Science Proceeding Series, 3, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2022.352

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)