Kualitas fisik organoleptik berbagai pakan komersial ayam broiler bentuk pellet dan crumble

Authors

  • Nova Hidayati Diyah Larasati Politeknik Negeri Jember
  • Adib Norma Respati Politeknik Negeri Jember
  • Mira Andriani Politeknik Negeri Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2025.886

Keywords:

crumble, organoleptic, pellet

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the organoleptic quality of various commercial feeds for broiler chickens in the form of pellets and crumbles. The feeds used were pellets brand A, pellets brand B, pellets brand C, crumbles brand A, crumbles brand B, and crumbles brand C. The parameters observed were organoleptic physical quality including color, texture, and aroma, and hardness tests were carried out on pellet-shaped feed. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively. The results of the observation showed that the organoleptic properties obtained from commercial broiler chicken feed in pellet and crumble form were included in the good category based on color, texture, and aroma indicators. The pellet hardness test obtained results for brands A, B, and C were 5.07, 6.03, and 6.0 kg, respectively. The conclusion from this observation is that the organoleptic physical quality of commercial broiler chicken feed in pellet and crumble form circulating in Jember is included in the good category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, S. A. S., & Sobhi, N. (2023). Process optimization in poultry feed mill. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36072-w

Ahmad, R. Z. (2009). Cemaran Kapang Pada Pakan Dan Pengendaliannya. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 28(1), 15–21.

Aslamyah, S., Hidayani, A. A., Badraeni, Azis, H. Y., & Fujaya, Y. (2021). The organoleptic, physical and chemical quality of mud crab fattening feed fermented with a microorganism mixture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 763(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/763/1/012032

Aslamyah, S., & Karim, M. Y. (2013). Organoleptic, physical, and chemical tests of artificial feed for milk fish substituted by earthworm meal (Lumbricus sp.). Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 11(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.19027/jai.11.124-131

Astuti, A., Hanim, C., & Akil, H. (2017). Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder. Proceeding International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP), 209–215.

Embaby E.M, Ayaat, N. M., Abd El-Galil, M. M., Allah Abdel-Hameid, N., & Gouda, M. M. (2015). Mycoflora and Mycotoxin Contaminated Chicken and Fish Feeds. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 1044–1054. http://www.curresweb.com/mejas/mejas/2015/1044-1054.pdf

Kementerian Pertanian. (2024). Outlook Daging Ayam Ras Pedaging 2024.

Marzuki, A., & Rozi, B. (2018). Pemberian Pakan Bentuk Cramble dan Mash TerhadapProduksi Ayam Petelor. Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, 18(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v18i1.849

Maulidya, A., Gunawan, J., & Ardiantono, D. S. (2020). Perancangan Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Rantai Pasok Produksi Pakan Ternak Unggas di PT Charoen Pokphand Indonesia (Tbk) Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v8i2.48220

Muramatsu, K., Massuquetto A., Dahlke A., & Maiorka A. (2015). Factors that Affect Pellet Quality: A Review. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A, 5(9), 717–722. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2015.09.002

Rakhmawati, Y., Sulistiyanto, B., & Sumarsih, S. (2017). Mutu Fisik Organoleptik Pelet Limbah Penetasan dengan Penambahan Bentonit dan Lama Penyimpanan yang Berbeda. 656–663. https://doi.org/10.14334/pros.semnas.tpv-2017-p.658-665

Riza Zainuddin Ahmad. (2009). Cemaran Kapang Pada Pakan Dan Pengendaliannya. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 28(1), 15–21.

Sukmawati, D., Saidah, N., Handayani, K. T., & Rahayu, S. (2018). The characteristics of fungi contaminating chicken feed in Tegal, Bogor, West Java. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 6(4), 472–480.

Supriadi, W. J., Jamila, J., & Syamsu, J. A. (2020). Kualitas Fisik Pakan Pellet Ayam Pedaging Fase Finisher dengan Penambahan Berbagai Bahan Perekat. AGROVITAL : Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian, 5(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.35329/agrovital.v5i2.1737

Utama, C. S., Sulistiyanto, B., & Rahmawati, R. D. (2020). Kualitas Fisik Organoleptis, Hardness Dan Kadar Air Pada Berbagai Pakan Ternak Bentuk Pellet. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 18(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.36762/jurnaljateng.v18i1.808

Wamsley, K. G. S., & Moritz, J. S. (2014). Assessment of diet formulation strategies that improve crumble quality and poult performance1. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2014-00972

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Larasati, N. H. D., Respati, A. N., & Andriani, M. (2025). Kualitas fisik organoleptik berbagai pakan komersial ayam broiler bentuk pellet dan crumble. Conference of Applied Animal Science Proceeding Series, 6, 203–208. https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2025.886

Most read articles by the same author(s)