Analisis peran kelembagaan dan kebijakan dalam mendorong adopsi smart farming untuk ketahanan pangan ternak Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/animpro.2025.865Keywords:
Adoption of Smart Farming, Livestock Policy, Institutions, Livestock Food Security, SocioeconomicsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of institutions and policies in promoting the adoption of Smart Farming (SF) to strengthen national livestock food security. Through a systematic literature review, relevant literature from leading scientific databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, covering the period 2010-2024, was evaluated based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and analyzed thematically. The research findings indicate that formal institutions (e.g., research institutions, extension services) and informal institutions (e.g., social norms, networks) play a crucial role in facilitating SF adoption, while government policies through financial incentives, digital infrastructure, regulations, and training are essential for creating a supportive environment. Despite the significant potential of SF, socio-economic challenges such as high costs and lack of digital skills still hinder adoption, particularly among small-scale farmers, leading to productivity gaps and sustainability issues. In conclusion, synergy between comprehensive policies and adaptive institutional strengthening is vital to optimize SF adoption, making the livestock sector more resilient and contributing significantly to sustainable food security.
Downloads
References
Amiri-Zarandi, M., Fraser, E., Duncan, E., & Dara, R. (2022). Big Data Privacy in Smart Farming: A Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159120.
Anastasiou, E., Pedersen, S., Gemtou, M., Isakhanyan, G., Erekalo, K., Kakkavou, K., Fountas, S., & Pazos-Vidal, S. (2024). Farmers’ Transition to Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Review of the Decision-Making Factors Affecting Adoption. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072828.
Atik, C. (2022). Towards Comprehensive European Agricultural Data Governance: Moving Beyond the “Data Ownership” Debate. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53, 701 - 742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01191-w.
Balon, R. (2022). What Is a Review Article and What Are Its Purpose, Attributes, and Goal(s). Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 91, 152 - 155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000522385.
Basso, B., Sambo, P., Orzes, G., Cesco, S., Mazzetto, F., & Borin, M. (2023). Smart agriculture and digital twins: Applications and challenges in a vision of sustainability. European Journal of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126809.
Belal, A., Abd-Elmabod, S., Zahran, M., El-Shirbeny, M., Gad, A., & Mohamed, E. (2021). Smart farming for improving agricultural management. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.08.007.
Beulens, A., Wolfert, S., Tekinerdogan, B., & Verdouw, C. (2021). Digital twins in smart farming. Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2020.103046.
Carrer, M., Filho, H., Saes, M., & De Mello Brandão Vinholis, M. (2021). The effect of meso-institutions on adoption of sustainable agricultural technology: A case study of the Brazilian Low Carbon Agriculture Plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124334.
Dzama, K., & Mapiye, O. (2024). Strengthening research-extension-farmer-input linkage system for sustainable smallholder livestock farming in Africa: progress and prospects. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04210-9.
Garate-Marín, C., Pérez-Ibarra, I., La Iglesia, D., Soler-Navarro, D., & Tenza-Peral, A. (2023). Evolution and diversity of institutions: Using institutional grammar to analyze governance changes in traditional crop-livestock systems. International Review of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.3332.
Jaishi, M. (2020). Strengthening Research-Education-Extension (R-E-E) Linkage in New Context of Federal Structured Nepal. , 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26710/relate.v2i1.1309.
Mallinger, K., Banhazi, T., Kokin, E., Opaliński, S., Kopler, I., Marchaim, U., Phillips, C., Neubauer, T., Soerensen, C., Gunnarsson, S., & Tikász, I. (2023). Farmers’ Perspectives of the Benefits and Risks in Precision Livestock Farming in the EU Pig and Poultry Sectors. Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182868.
Munkombwe, J., Dzvimbo, M., Mumba, C., Hoque, M., Siankwilimba, E., Hiddlestone-Mumford, J., & Hang’ombe, B. (2023). Bioecosystems towards sustainable agricultural extension delivery: effects of various factors. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03555-9.
Nor, R., Omar, Z., Fatah, F., Saili, J., Saili, A., Hamzah, N., & Ahmad, D. (2024). Exploration of the Challenges in Adopting Smart Farming Among Smallholder Farmers: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.45.1.1727.
Nor, R., Saili, A., Ahmad, D., Hamzah, N., Fatah, F., Omar, Z., & Saili, J. (2025). Smart Farming Technologies: Exploring the Factors of Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.62.1.9097.
Nwafor, I., Molieleng, L., & Fourie, P. (2021). Adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture by Communal Livestock Farmers in South Africa. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810468.
Ozcelik, A., & Güldal, H. (2024). From conventional to smart: Farmers’ preferences under alternative policy scenarios. New Medit. https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2401a.
Rochijan, A., Guntoro, B., & Hoang, Q. (2019). Dynamic Responses of Livestock Farmers to Smart Farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 372. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012042.
Srinivasan, K., & Yadav, V. K. (2023). An empirical investigation of barriers to the adoption of smart technologies integrated urban agriculture systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2189652.
Teklu, A., Simane, B., & Bezabih, M. (2023). Multiple adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovation for agricultural sustainability: Empirical evidence from the Upper Blue Nile Highlands of Ethiopia. Climate Risk Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100477.
Thaduru, S., & Katherasala, S. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Smart Farming Technology on Small-Scale Farmers: A Case Study of Jangoan Mandal, Telangana State. Agricultural Reviews. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2762.
Wiseman, L., Sanderson, J., Zhang, A., & Jakku, E. (2019). Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91, 1 - 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.007.
Zhu, H., Li, J., & , W. (2023). A systematic literature review of factors influencing the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10098-x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arif Rahman Azis, Woki Bilyaro, Muhammad Dani, Nurazizah Ramadhanti, Rizky Amrullah Chaniago, Akbar Abdurrahman Mahfudz, Kade Wahyu Saputri, Muhammad Subhan Hamka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
